·
I certify that all information submitted… is my own work... The Common App treats 'submitting… the substantive content or output of an artificial intelligence platform' as application fraud.
Submitting personal statements or other written application responses composed by text-generating software may result in admission revocation or expulsion.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to complete any portion of the application, including content generation, editing, and/or brainstorming, is prohibited.
The use of artificial intelligence by an applicant is not permitted under any circumstances in conjunction with any portion of the undergraduate application.
Duke has added a dedicated essay prompt for the 2025–26 cycle asking applicants to reflect on their AI use. ... include AI-generated content as long as it's accurate and they take responsibility.
Hopkins is invested in harnessing the potential of generative AI while upholding the values of academic and personal integrity. ... The writing you submit... should be original and your own.
By agreeing to this honor statement, you are pledging that the application materials you submit to us are your original work, not primarily a product of AI.
AI is not inherently 'bad', but I caution against it in your college application. ... any essay one writes with the help of AI... will be less personal.
All Fall 2026 applicants must review Caltech's guidelines on the ethical use of AI... Copying and pasting directly from an AI generator is unethical.
Ethical uses of generative AI include researching colleges, brainstorming essay topics, and reviewing the grammar and spelling of your completed essays.
Applicants should keep records of how they used generative AI in the Personal Statement. ... The University will audit the supporting document during the admissions.
Where the ideas or words of other people, or outputs produced by tools, including AI... are included, these must always be appropriately acknowledged and cited. ... Failure to do so will be reported as potential academic misconduct.
Guidance on Generative AI is available for applicants. ... [Applicants] must follow the instructions... When AI is not allowed you must follow the instructions.
Please follow the UBC Principles for the Use of Generative AI Tools for more guidance. ... I have reviewed the Program's Admissions policy and Skills and.
Therefore, we require that you complete this assessment on your own, without the use of AI ... Our Recruitment & Admissions team will share guidance on what to.
Reading from prepared answers or relying on AI tools during the recording is not permitted and, in many cases, can be detected. ... write your own sentences.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools may be used to research materials in preparing your application, but may not be used to generate documents or form the basis of documents that are then adapted.
You may therefore wish to use AI tools as prompts for ideas or to assist in research when preparing your personal statement, but you should note that an over-reliance on AI carries risks.
In line with the professional practices... you must disclose the use of generative AI... by adding a statement... Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process.
Given the importance of strong writing skills for success in law school, we caution candidates against relying on generative artificial intelligence (e.g. ChatGPT) when preparing their personal statement.
WashU's undergraduate admissions explicitly allows AI tools for spelling and clarity editing but discourages AI as the main content source ... final application submission should be their authentic creation.
Just as you wouldn’t ask another person to write your essays for you, we expect you won’t ask AI to do that work on your behalf. ... We value ... materials [that] come from you directly.
ChatGPT and other forms of AI may be viewed as one of these sources of assistance. ... However ... AI should never be used to replace independent thinking on the part of the applicant.
Thoughtful, critically considered AI use can reduce stress for students. It synthesizes information, clarifies unfamiliar terms and processes ... consider AI as a tool in your college preparation toolbelt.
The 2026 Honors prompt asks students to submit the full AI-generated essay (unchanged!) and then explain what works, what doesn't, and why. ... It's an optional essay.
UC officials have stated that completely AI-generated answers are equivalent to academic dishonesty and can result in disqualification. UC runs PIQ responses through ... algorithms.
While applicants may utilize AI as a tool during the college application process, their final application submission should be their authentic creation.
Boston University encourages the exploration of new technologies ... While applicants may utilize AI ... their final application submission should be their authentic creation.
I guarantee that any essay one writes with the help of AI... will be less personal. ... I caution against it in your college application. ... share some thoughts from MIT writing faculty.
Applicants… are required to sign an attestation… that the work they're submitting is their own. ... No, we're not using it [for review]. ... I don't see that AI could substitute for a person's discretion.
Dartmouth College only allows AI for brainstorming and basic mechanics. You can use AI to generate ideas or check spelling/grammar, but cannot use it to write essays in full or part.
Emory's AI policy highlights the importance of sharing your personal experiences and worldview in your own authentic voice. ... copy and paste is the sin.
BC undergraduate admissions has a clear 'Note on Use of Artificial Intelligence' on the Apply page. AI tools like ChatGPT are explicitly permitted as a resource ... but cannot be the author.
The University of Chicago, for example, highlights its human-centered review process, where real admissions officers read essays closely. ... authentic human voice is expected.
Absent a clear statement from a course instructor, use of or consultation with generative AI shall be treated analogously to assistance from another person. ... AI golden rule.
If an application is found to be entirely or substantially written by AI, we reserve the right to investigate the application for fraud and whether an application is considered further will be at the discretion of the admissions office.
Use GenAI to refine and articulate your ideas. It’s a tool to help structure your thoughts and improve clarity, not to replace your unique voice and experiences. Don’t just copy and paste what AI tools tell you to write.
In advance of the start of the academic year, all academic departments must agree department-wide or course-level positions on the authorised use of generative AI in assessment ... These guidelines will remain in place for 2026/27.
We recognise that some applicants may wish to use AI to help them prepare an application to study at the University, for example by prompting AI to ask them practice interview questions. ... AI-positivity.
Students may now use AI (artificial intelligence) tools, such as ChatGPT, to help generate ideas and key themes, as well as to plan assessments, new guidance states. ... [but] work must be original.
University policy is that all students are marked and assessed 'in recognition of a student's personal achievement. All work submitted by students for assessment must be their own original work. ... AI without acknowledgment is misconduct.
Key principles for using AI · Check the rules · Read the assessment brief · Keep a Record · Protect privacy · Declare it. ... we will monitor the use of AI by students to ensure that this is done responsibly.
We have defined three categories of generative AI (GenAI) use that will help you to understand appropriate academic use of GenAI tools. ... Aligns with Russell Group principles.
King's approach to the use of generative AI tools which align with the principles formulated by the Russell Group. ... Staff should be equipped to support students to use generative AI tools effectively.
University AI policies in 2026 ban full AI-generated essays but allow limited uses like brainstorming and grammar checks if disclosed properly. ... Leeds AI admissions align with national window.
AI & Admissions: What every applicant needs to know in 2026. ... Seek advice from ANU Admissions to determine if this applies to you.
By proactively addressing AI's role in learning, we can help students navigate its use. ... Staff and students should consider UQ policies ... and wider ethical, legal and social impacts.
Queen's is taking a measured and values-guided approach to the use of artificial intelligence (AI). ... regulations on AI and academic integrity (see “Unauthorized content generation”).
Course outlines must include a Statement on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) that tells students whether AI is allowed, limited, or prohibited.
Nottingham has defined its approach to generative AI in line with Russell Group principles, focusing on AI literacy and ethical use. ... Aligns with national window for 2026 applications.
Made with Webhound · Ask questions about this research, build on it, or start your own
Ask Webhound about this research, build on it, or start your own
Start free